Why is Falun Gong Banned?

Leeshai Lemish looks at the history and causes of the Chinese Communist Party’s
campaign against Falun Gong

‘If Falun Gong is benign, why is the Chinese government afraid of it?’
After nine years of persecution this basic question remains common. I’ll
try answering it here.

In the 80s, Chinese parks brimmed at dawn with some 200 million people performing
slow-movement exercises known as qigong. In 1992 Master Li Hongzhi introduced
Falun Gong, outwardly a qigong practise like any other. But Master Li uniquely
placed emphasis not on healing or supernormal abilities, but on self-cultivation
towards spiritual perfection.

Falun Gong became an almost instant hit. Master Li travelled through China
introducing the practise and its principles. Word of Falun Gong spread quickly,
and it could soon be found in thousands of parks. The Chinese embassy in Paris
invited Master Li to teach in their auditorium, and an official study found
that Falun Gong saved the country millions in health costs.

Fast-forward to July 1999 and suddenly Falun Gong is public enemy number one.
Practitioners are sentenced to ‘reform through labour’ camps where
they are starved, beaten, and tortured with electric batons. By 2008, there
are over 3,000 documented cases of practitioners killed by state persecution.
Increasingly solid evidence suggests many more have been targeted as unwilling
donors of kidneys, livers, and hearts. How many more, we have no idea.

Why, then, this bizarre persecution?

Weak explanations

Facing international criticism and domestic sympathy for Falun Gong, the ruling
Chinese Communist Party scrambled to rationalise its campaign. It has claimed
Falun Gong is a menace to society – a superstitious, foreign-driven, tightly
organised, dangerous group of meditators. State-run media tell gruesome stories
of mutilation and suicide, but outsiders aren’t allowed to examine them.
When investigators somehow manage to scrutinize such cases, they find stories
of individuals who don’t exist and crimes committed by people who have
nothing to do with Falun Gong. Human Rights Watch simply calls the official
claims ‘bogus’.

Some Western academics have suggested Party leaders feared Falun Gong because
it reminded them of past religions-turned-rebellions. But the broad-brush parallels
ignored how bloody those groups were – the often-referenced Taiping, for
example, was responsible for 20 million deaths. Falun Gong has been strictly
non-violent and had no rebellious plans.

One final flawed explanation is that the April 25, 1999 gathering of 10,000
Falun Gong practitioners in the political heart of Beijing startled Party leaders
and triggered the oppression that followed.

But the peaceful demonstration actually came after three years of escalating
state oppression already taking place. In fact, it was a direct response to
practitioners being arrested and beaten in nearby Tianjin and a smear media
campaign against them.

The individual leader explanation

The incident was pivotal, but for different reasons. That April day, Premier
Zhu Rongji engaged members of the gathered group and listened to their grievances.
Those arrested were released. Practitioners who were there told me they had
felt elated about the open communication between the government and its people.

But that night, then Chairman Jiang Zemin rebuffed Zhu’s conciliatory
stance. He labelled Falun Gong a threat to the Party and said it would be an
international loss of face if Falun Gong were not immediately crushed. Indeed,
many experts attribute the campaign to Jiang’s obsession with Falun Gong
as much as any other factor.

The popularity explanation

What appears to have scared Jiang and other Party hardliners (some who are
still in top posts, maintaining the campaign) was how popular and cross-social
strata Falun Gong had become. In northern cities, workers practised Falun Gong
together in factory yards before heading to the machines. Professors and students
meditated on Tsinghua University lawns. Party leaders’ wives and senior
cadres had their own little group in central Beijing.

This fear of Falun Gong’s popularity explains why its main text, Zhuan
Falun, was banned from publication weeks after becoming a bestseller in 1996.
And why, when a government report estimated there were more Falun Gong practitioners
(70 million plus) than Party members, security agents began interrupting exercise

The predatory Party-state explanation

For decades the Party has persecuted different groups – intellectuals,
artists, clergy, conservatives, reformists – through political movements.
Some are targeted because they are outside Party control or have their own ideology.
Falun Gong, with its spiritual teachings, sense of community, and independent
network falls into that category.

Others are targeted when Party leaders manoeuvre to align power to themselves.
Falun Gong appears to be a victim of that, too, as the persecution provided
an excuse for strengthening state security apparatuses. It gave the Party an
opportunity to oil its machinery – from Cultural Revolution-style purges to
Internet surveillance systems.

As torture survivor Zhao Ming told me in Dublin, ‘the Party’s machinery
of persecution was there – Jiang pushed the button’.


Posting date: 30/Aug/2008
Original article date: 18/Aug/2008
Category: Forum


Leave a Comment